Senate Proceeding on Oct 20th, 2011 :: 7:13:25 to 7:13:50
Total video length: 16 hours 26 minutes Stream Tools: Stream Overview | Edit Time

Note: MetaVid video transcripts may contain inaccuracies, help us build a more perfect archive

Download OptionsEmbed Video

Views:81 Duration: 0:00:25 Discussion

Previous speech:

Next speech:

7:11:45 to 7:13:34( Edit History Discussion )
Speech By: Jon Kyl

7:13:11 to 7:13:31( Edit History Discussion )

Jon Kyl: these states have less extreme environments. without this amendment they would be forced to buy a more expensive product they don't want and don't need. these states are mississippi, virginia, delaware, oklahoma, kansas, colorado, utah, texas, california, montana and wyoming. the u.s. department of has weighed in on this issue. they have said -- and i quote --

7:13:32 to 7:13:34( Edit History Discussion )

Jon Kyl: "requiring all galvanized steel

7:13:35 to 7:13:40( Edit History Discussion )
Speech By: Herb Kohl

7:13:35 to 7:13:41( Edit History Discussion )

Herb Kohl: to meet type 2 could add unnecessary expense for many states where the added thickness is not needed.

7:13:42 to 7:14:03( Edit History Discussion )

Jon Kyl: type 1 will protect guardrail components in many cases for the typical 20-year life design. the extra cost of type 2 galvanizing may be unwarranted." that's the u.s. department of transportation. the ohio department of transportation said while they only use type 2 that odot does not have a preference with regard to how the galvanizeation occurs.

7:13:45 to 7:16:45( Edit History Discussion )
Speech By: Jon Kyl